






|
Conducting E-mail Surveys and Interviews
by Moira Allen
E-mail can be an effective and convenient way to conduct an
interview, and is often appreciated by busy experts who don't
have time for a face-to-face or telephone interview. It enables
you to compose questions carefully rather than "on the fly," and
gives your interviewee time to respond carefully as well. E-mail
also offers a good way to follow up on a traditional interview,
when seeking clarification or additional information.
E-mail interviews are especially useful when the interviewee's
information will constitute a very small part of your article,
or, alternatively, when the article will be based almost verbatim
on the interviewee's words, as in a Q&A interview or similar
piece. They may also be appropriate when:
- The interviewee specifies a preference for being interviewed
in this fashion.
- The interviewee is too busy for a traditional interview.
- Conflicting schedules and/or time zones make telephone
interviewing difficult.
- You know exactly what questions you want to ask. (This often
requires some background knowledge of the subject.)
- The subject is relatively impersonal. (An e-mail interview
wouldn't be appropriate for discussing a tragic or deeply
personal issue.)
- The interview can be conducted with a limited number of
questions.
E-mail interviews are less effective when you're trying to
develop a profile or catch a personal glimpse of the interviewee
-- a profile that would include not only the individual's words
but also your observations of the person's appearance, actions,
skills, emotions, tone of voice, etc. They are less effective if
you don't know enough about a subject to develop useful
questions, or when you're more likely to get information from the
natural flow of questions and answers than from a predefined
script. In an e-mail interview, you can't change direction if a
more promising tangent emerges from the conversation; you can't
nudge the interviewee back on track if the conversation strays or
ask follow-on questions if your first questions don't elicit
enough information; and you can't ask for immediate explanations
or clarification.
The following strategies can help you develop and refine an
e-mail interview:
- Determine your goals before writing your questions. Decide
exactly what you need to know; then develop questions that will
best elicit that information.
- Ask open-ended questions rather than questions that can be
answered "yes" or "no." For example, instead of asking, "Do you
enjoy writing children's books?" ask, "What do you enjoy most
about writing children's books?" or "What are some of the things
you enjoy about writing children's books?"
- If necessary, explain why you are asking a particular
question, so the interviewee has a better idea of the response
you're looking for.
- Let the interviewee know what audience or market you're
writing for, so that the interviewee will know how detailed or
technical the information should be.
- Keep your questions as clear, uncomplicated, and short as
possible.
- Keep your list of questions as short as possible. Ten is
good; twenty is likely to tax an interviewee's patience.
- List your questions numerically, and leave space between each
question for the interviewee to insert the answer.
- Include a final "open" question -- e.g., "Is there anything
else you'd like to say on this subject that hasn't been covered
above?" that will enable the interviewee to add information or
ideas that weren't covered by your script.
- Let the interviewee know how soon you need the answers. (If
you need to follow up on a late interview, be polite; remember
that the interviewee is doing you a favor, and is under no
obligation to comply with your request or meet your deadline.)
- Don't be afraid to ask for clarification, or to follow up on
questions or answers that beg for additional information. And
always thank your interviewee!
E-mail interviews don't work for everyone, or in every
circumstance. They may not be appropriate, for example, if your
interviewee is uncomfortable with written questions (they may
look too much like a test) or doesn't enjoy expressing ideas in
writing. Under the right conditions, however, e-mail can add an
extra level of convenience to an interview -- and give you a
written record of the conversation.
E-mail Surveys
Another way to gather information via e-mail is to conduct a
survey. Once again, the Internet offers an unparalleled
opportunity: You can send a list of questions to hundreds of
potential respondents, at no cost.
At the same time, caution is in order. Some respondents may
regard a survey as a form of spam. Your e-mail should state the
nature and purpose of the survey as quickly, succinctly, and
courteously as possible. Assure respondents of privacy, and
guarantee that you won't cite anyone by name or organization
without permission. If you're soliciting comments as well as
statistics, ask respondents to indicate whether or not they may
be quoted, and how they should be cited.
Like interview questions, survey questions should be short,
clear, well-organized, and limited in number. Unlike interview
questions, however, survey questions should encourage "yes/no"
answers, or answers to a multiple-choice selection of options.
Respondents are also more likely to answer a short questionnaire
than a long one.
An easy format is to follow each question with the answer options
(e.g., "Yes" or "No") on a separate line or lines. Place a set
of parentheses in front of each option, with space for a
response:
1) Do you accept e-mail queries?
( ) Yes
( ) No
2) How do you prefer to receive manuscripts?
( ) Hardcopy (printed)
( ) On diskette
( ) By e-mail, in the body of the e-mail message
( ) As an e-mail attachment
This enables the respondent to simply insert an "x" in the
appropriate space and mail the form back as a reply. If you are
offering a multiple-choice question that could have more than one
answer, indicate whether you want the respondent to "check only
one" or "check all that apply."
To ensure your respondents' privacy, place all your survey
addresses in the "BCC" (blind copy) field of your header. Leave
the "TO" field blank, or enter a generic title in that field
(such as "editor" or "director"). That title will then show up
as the "addressee" on each survey form, but addressees won't be
able to see the addresses of your other respondents.. (You'll
receive a notice that this "blank" e-mail was undeliverable, but
the blind copies will go through.) If you have a large number of
addressees, send the survey in several batches rather than all at
once.
When you mail your survey, several may bounce back immediately as
undeliverable. Keep track of these bounces so that you know
exactly how many surveys went out. This will enable you to
calculate the correct percentage of responses. For example, if
you send out 100 surveys, get ten back as undeliverable, and
receive fifty responses, you have a 55 percent response rate.
The bulk of your responses will typically arrive in a flood
within the first two or three days of your mailing. After that,
the flow will taper to a trickle. At some point, you'll have to
decide when it's time to cut off the survey and tally the
results, even if you're still getting an occasional response.
It's also helpful to set up a separate mailbox to store your
responses until you're ready to tally them.
Once you've completed the survey, make a list of the respondents
and send them a thank-you note for participating. If respondents
are interested in the results of your survey, let them know when
and where the article will appear.
Perhaps more than any other electronic invention, e-mail has
changed the way writers and editors do business. Like any
technology, however, e-mail can easily be abused. Its simplicity
often fosters an inappropriate attitude of informality, an
inattention to detail. Because e-mail costs virtually nothing,
it can also be overused. Editors have no more wish to be
bombarded with e-mail messages than with phone calls. Authors,
experts, and others who post an e-mail address on a Web site
still value their privacy, and are under no obligation to reply
to every message they receive.
Simple courtesy and professionalism, however, will go far toward
keeping lines of communication open between writers, editors, and
experts, for whom the negatives are generally far outweighed by
the positives!
Related Articles:
- Conducting Interviews, by Moira Allen
-
http://www.writing-world.com/basics/interviews.shtml
- A Beginner's Guide to Interviewing, by Dawn Copeman
- http://www.writing-world.com/dawn/dawn10.shtml
- Don't Reach for Just Any Old Quote, by John Rains
-
http://www.writing-world.com/basics/rains.shtml
More Information:
- Inbox Journalism
- http://www.ajr.org/article.asp?id=4005
- A great article examining the pros and cons of e-mail interviews, particularly as they apply to journalism and reporting.
Copyright © 2001 Moira Allen
Moira Allen, editor of Writing-World.com, has published more than 350 articles and columns and eight books, including How to Write for Magazines, Starting Your Career as a Freelance Writer, The Writer's Guide to Queries, Pitches and Proposals (of which a completely updated edition is forthcoming in spring 2010), and her most recent book, Writing to Win: The Colossal Guide to Writing Contests. Allen has served as columnist and contributing editor for The Writer and has written for Writer's Digest, Byline, and various other writing publications. In addition to Writing-World.com, Allen hosts TimeTravel-Britain.com (a site dedicated to historic travel destinations in Britain); Mostly-Victorian.com (a growing archive of articles and excerpts from Victorian books and magazines); The Pet Loss Support Page; and AllenImages.net (showcasing her photography). She can be contacted at
editors "at" writing-world.com.
This article is available for reprint at no charge.
Click here for details!
|
MORE RESOURCES FROM THE EDITOR: | |
|
|






Moira Allen
 Create Your Badge
|