



|
What Is Literary Fiction?
Literary Editors Share Their Views
by Moira Allen
Many articles and books on the art of writing fiction tell you that
getting a few stories published in leading literary magazines can
do wonders for your writing career. Breaking into the literary
magazines can help you "get noticed." And when it comes time to
submit that novel to a publisher, having a track record of literary
publications certainly won't hurt.
But what, exactly, is literary fiction? While there are hundreds
of literary magazines, ranging from top-name publications that have
been producing award-winning fiction for decades to tiny zines that
spring up (and quite often disappear) overnight, obtaining an
actual "definition" of literary fiction is not so easy. Many
articles try to define it by stating what it is not: "genre" or
mainstream fiction, for example. One book even defines literary
fiction as work that would be read "in college English classes" as
opposed to "the grocery checkout line." [Source: The Beginning
Writer's Answer Book, by Jane Friedman, http://www.writersdigest.com/TipOfTheDay/?m_nTip=12527
].
Unfortunately, the writers' guidelines posted by many litmags
aren't terribly helpful either. While we're always told to "check
the guidelines" to determine what a publication wants, many litmags
simply tell us that they're looking for "great writing" or ask
writers to send "their best stories." Some don't even say that
much, but simply specify a maximum word count.
To attempt to answer this question, therefore, I decided to go
directly to the editors themselves. Over a dozen literary-magazine
editors weighed in on what they believe makes a story "literary,"
what they look for in a literary story, and what they recommend for
writers who seek to break into literary magazines.
It's About Style...
Two qualities emerged as being of paramount importance to literary
editors: style and innovation. "Literary fiction for me is
primarily based in language," says Marc Fitten, editor of The
Chattahoochee Review. "How is the writer using language? A
strong, distinctive voice is the first thing I read for. Whammo!
Does the voice grab me as a reader and make me read the story?"
According to Robert Stewart, editor of New Letters Quarterly,
literary fiction "uses language in fresh ways, and uses form in
fresh ways. It does not rely on convention but... on process of
discovery. Editors are looking for something that is
unprecedented." Alyce Wilson, editor of Wild Violet Magazine,
feels that "literary fiction... often aims to do more than simply
tell a story: whether to explore a concept or to complicate
traditional narrative and character development. Typically,
literary fiction offers the reader a deeper look at the human
experience."
Often, this means that the structure of a literary story may be
experimental or nontraditional. "The writer does not set out to
tell a story from start to finish and follow the usual rules of
engaging the casual reader's attention," says John Reid of
WinningWriters.com. "Instead, the writer's approach is
experimental, although it also helps to adhere to some of the
current academic precepts such as limiting dialogue (or dispensing
with it altogether), and abandoning formal structures of plotting
and characterization."
G.S. Evans, coeditor of Café Irreal, believes that "in its broadest
sense, literary fiction is fiction that attempts to communicate
ideas, concepts, or feelings that transcend the structural elements
of the story, e.g., the plot, the characters, the setting. Thus,
there have been many exciting and entertaining stories about ships
at sea, but a work like Moby Dick is more than that in that it also
explores certain symbolic, psychological and metaphysical themes."
Alan Davis, senior editor of New Rivers Press, says that "literary
fiction renders an experience that has not been rendered before
(originality) in language (style, voice, etc.) unique to that
experience." He recommends that the writer "enter a
theater-of-the-mind, and make sure that you give your reader
sufficient sensory detail to experience the human drama unfolding
in that theater."
"When I think of the word 'literary,' I envision writing that is
entirely memorable, vivid and original," says Veronica Ross,
fiction editor of The Antigonish Review. "The language is
wonderful. The story can be quite simple, but it will impart a
certain feeling when you read it. A feeling of joy, of surprise
perhaps. There is nothing predictable about these 'literary'
stories. The voice is big."
One word that came up more than once in reference to style was
"panache." Kathryn Gray, editor of New Welsh Review, seeks
"originality, daring. That indefinable thing: panache." Chris
Busa, editor of Provincetown Arts Press, expands on the
"indefinable" bit by noting that literary fiction "describes
storytelling that possesses creative panache in metaphorical
thinking and uniquely individual phrasing, the voice of an
interesting mind speaking freshly and authentically. Such voices
arrest our attention."
It's About Character...
To many editors, character development was nearly as important as
style. "It is usually about characters and 'what happens'... the
arc of the narrative -- if there is a narrative -- is driven by the
characters' conflicts or desires," says Beth Alvarado, fiction
editor of Cutthroat: A Journal of the Arts. "The best of literary
fiction gives us glimpses of the characters' particular worlds and
relationships and also opens a 'new' window on to our own worlds
and lives and relationships." She looks for "characters that are
compelling. They don't have to be sympathetic, but we have to be
engaged by them. We want to believe them -- even if they're
'unreliable' -- we want to see the worlds they inhabit, we want to
be emotionally or psychologically grounded in their reality -- but
there also needs to be some kind of imaginative transformation of
'the real.'"
Ronna Wineburg, senior fiction editor of Bellevue Literary Review,
defines literary fiction as "fiction that focuses on character
development, language, metaphor, and, to a lesser extent, on
plot... Characters are developed and dimensional." To Wineburg,
"uniqueness of characters, description and situation" are
particularly important.
"I believe literary fiction is character-driven, not plot-driven,"
says Regina Williams, editor and publisher of Storyteller Magazine.
"Because of this, readers sometimes find the stories have
unsatisfactory endings. Literary fiction deals more with the
characters themselves and their internal struggles." Such stories,
she notes, may not have happy endings -- and may not even have
"likeable" characters so long as they have good characters, "even
good bad characters." Robert Stewart notes that literary fiction
should "confront or have the character confront a moral dilemma."
To John Wang, editor of Juked, literary fiction may be "anything
that sheds some kind of insight on the human condition, escapism
that ultimately brings you back to the present world in a way,
teaches you something about it. You can have literary genre
fiction... but that fiction has to do something to shed light on
our world, and not only take you away from it. While doing so, it
should challenge our understanding of the world; make us question
our preconceived notions of it."
Alexis Enrico Santi, editor of Our Stories, explains how these two
elements of style and character can be woven together: "Literary
fiction is writing that concentrates not on the climax but all the
foreplay before and after... It's not exactly that a story about
the last time you fell in love isn't interesting; it's that the
story is inside of the human element that makes up their actions
and the individuals which stand in their way... What bridges the
gap between the reader and writer is the essential senses of human
emotion: smell, sight, hearing, touch -- these are universal.
Everyone who reads is looking to access their own emotions to
'live' inside your fiction. Whenever you are communing with these
senses, you will be connecting with your reader."
But What About Plot?
Over and over, editors stated a belief that one of the primary
differences between literary fiction and mainstream fiction was
that mainstream (including genre) fiction tends to have a stronger
emphasis on story or plot than on character. Ronna Wineberg, for
example, feels that "most 'mainstream' fiction is plot-driven
rather than character-driven." Alyce Wilson believes that
"mainstream fiction focuses primarily on telling a story." Beth
Alvarado says, "I don't think mainstream fiction... takes as many
risks with character, form, subject matter, or style as literary
fiction can because its primary concern is the market place."
Does this mean that plot is unimportant in literary fiction? Not
at all, according to Wang. "You need to provide a compelling plot.
A vivid setting. Everything, really, is rather important." Alan
Davis says that "plot is the crucible that reveals character."
Francine Ringold, editor of Nimrod, looks for "plots that are
intriguing, that are not predictable. A strong sense of place is
good, and a novel use of timing is inviting." Regina Williams
points out that stories must have "a believable storyline. You
have to make the reader believe it's possible."
According to Ronna Winegold, "If literary fiction doesn't have a
plot or narrative movement (even just in the inner life of the
character), it won't hold the attention of the reader, won't be
effective. Beautiful writing needs some glue to hold it together.
As an editor, I read stories that are elegantly written, but
nothing happens in these stories. One could say these stories are
examples of literary fiction, in terms of the descriptive style,
but they don't work. The details are authentic, but there is no
narrative movement, so we reject these stories, no matter how
beautiful the writing is."
Winegold also points out that "suspension of disbelief," so often a
requirement in mainstream fiction, is just as important for
literary fiction. "The reader has to 'suspend disbelief' in any
kind of fiction... Samuel Taylor Coleridge coined the term, 'willing
suspension of disbelief for the moment which constitutes poetic
faith.' I've always thought in any kind of fiction, the writer has
to convince the reader that the narrative is what actually happened
or what could have happened (John Gardner says this in his The Art
of Fiction)."
This ability to suspend disbelief often enables literary fiction to
cross the line into the realm of the fantastic and "surreal," if
not directly into speculative fiction. Beth Alvarado notes that
"for instance, in magical realism, a very old man with wings may
fall from the sky -- this happens in Gabriel Garcia Marquez's
famous story, 'A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings' -- and the
reader suspends disbelief that this could actually happen and is
interested, instead, in how this event affects the villagers, how
they treat the old man, and what that reveals about them and, by
extension, perhaps us... In George Saunders' story 'Sea Oak,' the
protagonist's aunt literally comes back from the dead, but the
issue is... what her 'resurrection' means to him, what it reveals
about their lives. In literary fiction, I think we're more
interested in the characters' psychology, how they react to these
fantastic situations and what the stories mean or what they reveal
about human nature or about our society."
Despite editors' emphasis on the "experimental" structure of
literary fiction, the necessity of having a "plot" brings the
writer back to the necessity of being able to construct a story
with, well, most of the elements we commonly associate with
stories. Regina Williams, for example, sees too many stories where
writers "cannot keep the story together from start to finish. So
many manuscripts I read fail in that respect. The first paragraph
doesn't catch my attention, or they stray off course in the middle
or the ending doesn't bring it all together. If any of the three
fail, the entire story fails." Her most common reason for
rejection is "endings that fall flat." Alyce Wilson also has a
problem with poor endings. "One of my pet peeves is unjustified
endings. If the ending is weak and/or unjustified, I usually end
up rejecting it."
Alexis Enrico Santi, on the other hand, looks for "a winning
opening page. It has to move, it has to matter. If it is dry and
makes us wait it isn't working. I am looking for a good, beautiful
story that makes me learn something new about life. I reject at
least forty or fifty stories a month that just don't go anywhere.
The pacing and tension are slow... they assume that the reader is
interested in continuous tags of dialogue, riddled with unimportant
gestures and gesticulations -- they're not important. At the root
of every story is what matters. This root can be death, love,
friendship, whatever... so the writer has to keep building around
that, slowly and methodically, and do so in a way that is going to
entertain us. As long as everything points back to your core
message, your root, then you'll be fine."
So How Do You Get There?
Not surprisingly, editors had a variety of tips for writers seeking
to develop their "literary" voice, but one emerged above all the
rest: "Read, read, read!" Joseph Levens, editor of The Summerset
Review, adds, "of all that you read, highlight that which you
really liked. Read those stories again, critically. You learn
more than you think by reading work you enjoyed." Alan Davis
advises, "Read, read, read, and read some more, not as a critic but
as a writer -- that is, read the way a musician listens to music."
"Read short story anthologies and all those 'Best of...'
anthologies," advises Beth Alvarado. "Read literary magazines and
journals. Find a writer you like and read everything he or she has
written. Borrow some of their techniques; experiment seriously and
with intent. Take a class. Keep a writer's journal. Be curious."
Christopher Busa adds, "Push your imagination. Develop it like a
muscle kept supple through daily use."
"The most important thing is to be well read," says Kathryn Gray.
"That means strongly, knowledgeably connected with contemporary
literature, as well as respectful and aware of the tradition. Any
writer of merit is a passionate, engaged and discriminating reader.
I [also] think most writers suffer from over-enthusiasm: running
before they can walk. Writing is a long-haul journey. Take your
time, develop and hone your craft, make those important mistakes in
private before you start sending out. There's no hurry."
"Never give up," says Regina Williams. "Even the most well known
authors have gotten rejection letters. Rejection letters should
just make you more determined. Read a lot of literary fiction.
Learn the craft before submitting. Rewrite, rewrite, and rewrite
again."
Alexis Enrico Santi takes us to the bottom line: "Read, read, read
everything you can get your hands on. However, don't be afraid.
Take some damn chances and be audacious. It won't get written
until you decide to cast fear aside and pull that damn trigger.
Let your imagination explode all over the page and cry over it,
sweat over it, and pour everything you have into that first draft
getting your story out and then, when it is all done--go back to it
and revise."
And that's good advice, no matter what kind of fiction you're
writing!
Ten Reasons for Literary Rejection
- Stories that are unsuitable for the magazine. (Regina Williams,
Storyteller Magazine)
- Stories that are well written but predictable. Spelling errors
can be fixed, but "a prosaic story remains boring." (Antigonish
Review)
- Stereotypical plots. (Francine Ringold, Nimrod)
- Stories that have not been thought out. (Marc Fitten, The
Chattahoochee Review)
- A weak opening. "If a manuscript does not open with a strong
lead, I often only skim the rest of the story. If it does not grab
me right away, it will not grab our readership." (Alyce Wilson,
Wild Violet Magazine).
- Too much cleverness. "[Writers] get carried away with their own
cleverness and exhaust the reader's patience," says John Reid.
"People try too hard to be clever," agrees John Wang of Juked.
"Many stories immediately come off as being the work of an amateur
because the writer is going out of his/her way to sound smart and
funny."
- Stories in which the voice sounds false. (Chris Busa,
Provincetown Arts Press)
- "Sluggish prose, overwriting, lack of originality (i.e.,
derivative), lack of texture, weak tone, rambling submissions that
evidence no knowledge of the magazine or the type of standard and
style we favour." (Kathryn Gray, New Welsh Review)
- Repeated or careless use of the same word (Joseph Levens, The
Summerset Review); overuse of pet names (Francine Ringold, Nimrod).
- Stories that are otherwise excellent but just don't fit the
editorial mix of a particular issue. "For example, we can't
publish four stories on breast cancer in one issue or include four
stories told by a child narrator. We need a balance of subject
matter, style, voice, and point of view in each issue of journal,"
says Ronna Wineberg of The Bellevue Literary Review. Beth Alvarado
of Cutthroat agrees: "We don't want all of the stories in one
issue to be about relationships or grief or fishing. We also want
some variety in craft: we don't want all of the stories to be from
a first-person point of view or to be heavy on narration. Usually
one or two stories really stand out, and then we arrange the rest
of the 'bouquet' of stories around them, so that the issue has some
texture and depth."
The Literary Magazines and Presses:
Here's how to find the magazines and presses cited in this article:
- The Antigonish Review
- http://www.antigonishreview.com/
- Bellevue Literary Review
- http://blr.med.nyu.edu/
- Café Irreal
- http://www.cafeirreal.com
- The Chattahoochee Review
- http://www.gpc.edu/~gpccr/
- Cutthroat: A Journal of the Arts
- http://www.cutthroatmag.com/
- Juked
- http://www.juked.com
- New Letters Quarterly
- http://www.newletters.org
- New Rivers Press
- http://www.newriverspress.com/
- New Welsh Review
- http://www.newwelshreview.com
- Nimrod
- http://www.utulsa.edu/nimrod/
- Our Stories
- http://www.ourstories.us/
- Provincetown Arts Press
- http://www.provincetownarts.org
- Storyteller Magazine
- http://www.storyteller1.upcsites.org/page/page/3761885.htm
- The Summerset Review
- http://www.summersetreview.org
- Wild Violet Magazine
- http://www.wildviolet.net
- WinningWriters.com
- http://www.winningwriters.com
Related Articles:
To Lit or Not to Lit?, by Moira Allen
Copyright © 2010 Moira Allen
Moira Allen, editor of Writing-World.com, has published more than 350 articles and columns and eight books, including How to Write for Magazines, Starting Your Career as a Freelance Writer, The Writer's Guide to Queries, Pitches and Proposals, and Writing to Win: The Colossal Guide to Writing Contests. Allen has served as columnist and contributing editor for The Writer and has written for Writer's Digest, Byline, and various other writing publications. In addition to Writing-World.com, Allen hosts TimeTravel-Britain.com (a site dedicated to historic travel destinations in Britain); Mostly-Victorian.com (a growing archive of articles and excerpts from Victorian books and magazines); The Pet Loss Support Page; and AllenImages.net (showcasing her photography). She can be contacted at
editors "at" writing-world.com.
This article is available for reprint at no charge.
Click here for details!
|
MORE RESOURCES FROM WRITING-WORLD.COM: | |
|
|




Moira Allen
 Create Your Badge
|