Protecting Your Work from Electronic Pirates
by Charles Petit
Electronic publishing is relatively easy, and getting easier all
the time. Unfortunately, that means that electronic piracy is also
relatively easy, and getting easier all the time. However
characterized, electronic piracy is theft of an author's
intellectual property.
Whether the piracy is a sneaky unauthorized reposting of a work
on an obscure webpage, a brazen corporate theft through
unauthorized reissue of a work on a CD-ROM, or something different,
authors can take steps to protect their rights. However, a knee-
jerk "stop it now or I'll sue!" is not necessarily the best
reaction. A writer's objective is to stop the infringement, not
just make life difficult. This results in one of two goals:
- Getting paid for the reprint.
Once paid for the rights used,
there's no infringement any more, is there?
- Removing the work.
This may be required by exclusivity clauses
in the original publication (such as a one-year option on
electronic rights), or if the work appears in an inappropriate
forum (such as a piece of erotica used as an example of the
degeneracy of American culture on a fire-and-brimstone
fundamentalist crusade site).
Step One: Awareness
Regardless of the specific goal, the first step in dealing with
electronic piracy is always awareness. It is impossible to combat
unknown piracy. Authors should periodically search the internet
for their work, both to find unauthorized copies on the Internet
itself and to find references to other unauthorized copies, such
as CD-ROMs. Moira Allen's article
Help! Someone Stole My Article! provides an excellent outline
of methods and benefits of doing these searches.
Step Two: The Complaint
The second step in combating electronic piracy is a complaint to
the apparent infringer. The complaint should be a polite,
professional note (such as Letter 1 at the end of this article)
informing the infringer of the infringement. Sometimes the
infringement is inadvertent, and may actually result in a
professional sale of the material. For example, one writer
discovered that one of his short personal pieces appeared on
several "inspirational" websites, without attribution. The writer
sent a polite email to each site administrator claiming the piece
as his. By being polite, the writer turned six infringements of
his copyright into sales and got his name out in a new market. The
writer believes that these site administrators were just naive --
they each took something they found posted without attribution and
assumed it was okay to use.
There is one exception to the "be polite" rule: blatant, admitted
piracy. Another writer found a site that posted one of her short
stories, including attribution, without authorization. The site
admitted on its main page that most of its content was not
authorized by the writers! A polite note is not going to do much
good with people who show such blatant disrespect for the writer
in the first place. There's no need for invective, but jumping
right to a demand for compensation and removal of the posting is
appropriate.
Remember that the copyright holder is the one who should complain.
If the original publisher purchased all rights, or the copyright
itself, inform the publisher and let the publisher take action.
After all, the publisher may have authorized the reuse! In any
event, always inform the original publisher of an infringement.
If that restaurant review from last Thursday's Herald is on a
particular website, other material may have been taken from the
Herald without permission -- and the Herald will certainly want
to look.
Step Three: Contacting the Infringer's ISP
Unfortunately, some pirates will not pay heed to a shot across
the bow, however politely worded. That means it's time to complain
to someone bigger: the ISP or other service or distribution
provider. The complaint should still be professional in tone,
although perhaps less forgiving (Letter 2).
The electronic world does not always make it easy to determine
who the ISP really is. Sometimes it's obvious, as in the case of
GeoCities or AOL; sometimes it's not. One solution is to use NSI's
database for US-based commercial URLs or ARIN for numeric or non-US
addresses. If the "real" home domain's home page doesn't include
contact information, the Register of Copyrights maintains a useful
database.
Some ISPs -- GeoCities/Yahoo!, among others -- claim that they will
not take any action without seeing the certificate of copyright
registration. Don't believe them. This is really just lawyerese for
"we won't resolve disputed copyrights." The notice of infringement
in Letter 2 (referring to 17 U.S.C. section 512) makes the ISP
responsible once notified of the infringement in writing, and is
signed "under penalty of perjury." The copyright need not have been
registered at all -- copyright registration is required only for a
lawsuit, and late registration only limits the remedies available
in court. Regardless of the ISP's protests to the contrary, the ISP
has certainly messaged the account holder with a "just what is
going on here?" query, if not more.
Then there's the question of how to send the message. If the only
available contact information is email, use it -- but immediately
print the outgoing message and sign and date the printout.
Hopefully, the available contact information will include a fax
number and/or snailmail address, which are much better than
relying on email.
This general approach is appropriate for any electronic piracy,
ranging from an email newsletter to a huge, internationally known
database of reprint articles. But what if it doesn't work? That's
when it's time to consult a lawyer who practices copyright and
publishing law. Some organizations, such as the National Writer's
Union, will provide some assistance to their members with piracy
problems, but that help is of widely varying quality and
aggressiveness. A few other organizations, such as Volunteer
Lawyers for the Arts, will also provide assistance, but they're
overwhelmed with requests.
Letter 1
Dear [Sir/Madam]:
On [date], I noticed that your [site/email newsletter/electronic
product] [exact name and URL, if available] included an
[attributed/unattributed] copy of my copyrighted [story/article/
review] [writer's title]. According to my records, I have not
authorized this use.
Please contact me immediately so we can work out either an
appropriate agreement for this use or an agreement to terminate
this use.
Letter 2
Dear Sir or Madam:
A webpage hosted by your service ([full URL]), retrieved [date
and time], is infringing upon my copyright in [title]. I have
attempted to resolve this directly with the account holder
without satisfaction. Please remove the referenced page from
your service and take other appropriate action against the
account holder to prevent future infringement.
Pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, this letter
serves as actual notice of infringement in the event of legal
proceedings. The information in this notification is accurate,
and under penalty of perjury, I state that I am the owner of an
exclusive right infringed by the specified URL.
For More Information:
- NSI
- http://www.nsi.com
- ARIN
-
http://www.arin.net/whois/arinwhois.html
- Register of Copyrights
-
http://www.loc.gov/copyright/onlinesp
Any legal commentary contained in this article is general
commentary only. Do not take it as legal advice for your situation
or as an attorney-client communication.
Copyright © 2000 Charles E. Petit
Charlie Petit is a former attorney specializing in intellectual property and publishing law.
MORE RESOURCES FROM THE EDITOR:
|